EQUAL REPRESENTATION OF PEOPLE WITHOUT BIASES FOR MORALITY
Human Faith is heavenly light of knowledge restriction on sacred light is eclipse on humanity and blasphemy
THE PEOPLE PARTY
P.O.Box 9796 Forestville CT U.S.A
Qusar-E-Batool Multan Pakistan
511 Pine St Bristol, CT 06010
ph: 860.582.2226 Blocked
alt: 860.583.3338 working
Laws Should Change in Accordance with the Time of 2016
The First Creator, God the Sublime, entrusted humanity with two powers, one practical and one theoretical, so that through them we might attain the perfection intended for humanity. Supreme Being also bound one of them to the other as human being by making the perfection of the first dependent on the perfection of the second. Humanity is thus innately disposed to seek out a theoretical understanding and to discover the true state of matters and before he begins any practical work, for he undertakes no task unless the results thereof induce him to do so. Now, not every activity produces the results desired indeed, in order to do so, it must be accomplished in a particular fashion. Certainly, the ability to envision results and knowledge of the methods involved in activities are among those things that depend on the capacity for rational inquiry. If this capacity is fully developed, then work turns out in the best fashion, the benefit that results is greater, and the outcome is more complete.
For this reason, all humans are bent on rounding out their theoretical knowledge, first and in particular so that through it they might be guided to the proper methods for the work they perform in order to lead a full life. They also do so in order to distinguish results according to their relative benefits, so that they might put each result opposite a particular task, arranged in a known manner, beginning with that which produces benefits most quickly, is accomplished most easily, and is set forth most reliably.
Human knowledge is in effect a collection of rules about useful benefits, by which people organize the methods of work, family, culture and habits that lead to those benefits, so that they will not stumble along their path and confuse the beneficial with the harmful, thus encountering hardship and suffering at the hands of misfortune.
Since the conditions of nations depend on their collective stores of information and knowledge, and the two are related in terms of cause and effect, each country adopts rules for its activities and chooses laws for its circumstances in accordance with its power of theoretical investigation and its level of thought. At no time does it contradict the customs and traditional values that its natural disposition has established, unless fortune provides it chance to ascend to a higher level of rational examination and a more elevated plane of thought.
Because laws are the basis of activities organized properly to produce manifest benefit, the results of theoretical inquiry, and the outcome of intellectual investigation, the laws of each sovereign country correspond to its level in understanding of knowledge and creator laws vary in accordance with nations 'varying levels of knowledge, or the lack thereof.
It is not permissible, to apply the law of one group of people to another group who differ in level of understanding, because the law will not suit their state of thinking and will not Latch their customs and traditional habits. Otherwise, order among the second group will be disturbed, their path toward good sense will be obscured, and the road to understanding will be closed before them the courant condition of many countries is lack of basic understanding of nature. They will consider the correct to be invalid and the right to be wrong. They will pervert the application of these laws, change 'them, and put others in their place, so that what is a cure for others will become a disease for them. This is because of short-sightedness on their part and ignorance of what these laws were intended to accomplish, what motivated them, and what made them necessary. Need is the guiding master, true leader and the first teacher. When people properly recognize need, they strive to fulfill it. They are restricted by it, and do not go against its dictates and prescriptions. If the institution of laws within a nation is motivated by its need for them, it will not contravene them simply because of circumstances. However, people who were not induced by need to institute such laws do not consider them among life's fundamental necessities. They are not to be blamed for discarding such laws, and demanding that they abide by such laws would impose an impossibly difficult obligation. It is more appropriate for them to learn first what the need is, so that they might be equal with others in their level of knowledge and united with them in the consequences of confusion.
It has been the custom of legislators in every age from time of Noah until today 2015, in instituting laws, to take into account the level of intelligence of those for whom laws are to be instituted, so that the people will not find them unclear, incomprehensible, or devoid of discernible purpose. A little reprimand suffices and the threat of a light punishment restrains many a group of people whose temperaments are readily compliant, whose spirits are noble, and whose senses are quick to be affected. Such people should have prescribed for them laws that suit their conditions. They should not be burdened with severe laws; for they will be harmed by these laws at the time ofLegislators have also customarily paid full attention to customs and traditional habits of people. In establishing laws, they do not deviate from the harshness or leniency that customs and traditional habits Nimrod, Pharaoh and Yezidis of Stone Age had, like recently someone who takes more than the proper dose of medicine as Mr. Bush and Mr. Barak Hussain Obama did.
For example, suppose that one of these people we have described did something that required punishment. If imprisonment, for him, troubles his temperament and severely pains his spirit, because of his pride and delicate sensibility, and if the spirits of his clan and the inhabitants of his town cannot bear that someone should say "So and so was imprisoned for such and such a crime, “Islam" the occurrence of such a thing to one of them would be a very great check against perpetrating the crime he committed. The sentencing of this criminal then to a more severe punishment, such as banishment, exile, or hard, humiliating labor, would be a clear injustice. It might cause his death soon thereafter, or produce long- lasting dejection and perennial rancor in the hearts of his folk and clan, due to their certainty that the ruling was wrong and the judge unjustly denied the Supreme Court Case 11-768 with the coordination from Hartford CHRO case and forced family to break a part and financial hardship for Mehdi. This would only lead, in the long run, to the fires of rebellion being lit and the heat of hatred flaming up among innocent victims of The Patriot Act. Either they would be destined to commit bad acts or else their spirits would be extinguished, their temperaments humiliated, and their pride utterly crushed. A miserable end indeed but thank God I didn't do any of these. Perhaps tried to change constitutional politics with minor political party The People Party until I was forced to closed business and file for Bankruptcy.
Many nations have raised its members on coarseness and the shunning of delicacy. Their insides are filled with vileness and baseness, and their spirits are far from honorable. Such people are only deterred from perpetrating offenses or restrained from the pursuit of immoral aims by harsh laws based on severe punishments. It is a clear mistake to sentence a guilty party from among such a group to imprisonment, for example, since his spirit considers even harsher punishments to be trifling. The purpose of instituting laws is to prevent that which disturbs order, disrupts the structure of society, banns individual interests, and detracts from public welfare. If laws do not serve this purpose, then they are but empty burdens thrown on the shoulders of the people. Indeed, we should see them as merely widening the sphere of corruption and increasing instances of injustice. Perhaps The Patriot Act is the clear violation of instituting law that forced me to give up my freedom and caused sickness and fear of Government.
As an example of what I have just stated, I may cite the former state of our own. Some time ago, Native Americans inhabitants were barbarians who did not know what was good for them, for ignorance had a tight bold on them in that era. They did not pay attention to agriculture, despite the availability of the necessary means for it and the suitability of the soil. Native Americans did not know the value of the land they owned. They continually wished that their properties would be transferred to someone else, so that they would not be burdened with paying the taxes that the government had imposed on them. They avoided tarrying in town long enough for the hands of the governors to grab them. Native Indians left and settled in other villages, fearing that they could not survive through farming and seeking better ways to accumulate wealth and fortune. The government was thus compelled to force villagers to take possession of the land and farm it, instituting harsh laws for violators, including provisions for severe punishment and slavery. When the time came for the government to demand the taxes, the prisons filled up with those left behind by the others who had fled their villages and the madcap for whips became brisk. .
It appeared that everyone had fled, been imprisoned, or ached from beatings. The country regularly withered and flourished at particular times of the year without variation. It continued in this sorry state for a long time, until the Abraham’s spirit amended the 13th amendment that became attached to work, and agriculture was made easy for them. Americans entered a new stage of development as a result of measures which made the methods of farming easier and got the populace to remain in their villages with families. They adopted a unified plan for the farming of their lands and were no longer overly concerned with government of color, because they had begun to learn the importance of agriculture, lacking it seriously and competing in their crop yields. So the laws that the government had adopted to prevent farmers from fleeing, neglecting to work the land, and defaulting on the submission of taxes changed to a certain extent. Then various oppressive hands had successive control over them for quite a long period, but they remained sealed in their properties. They grew tired of abuse, and their spirits longed for a just law by which the matter of their tax payments would be put in order. The hand of divine Providence brought to them, through the government of America someone who established lot them a just law concerning this issue. With this new amendments entered a new era, and the sound of the whip was removed from among its people of color.
The punishment for falling behind in the payment of taxes was changed so as not to debase an honor, and public welfare was regulated with Kennedy with just two years in office according to laws that do not go against the inclinations of the power, in a fashion different from that followed in earlier laws. This was a consequence of the difference between the two conditions and the change in the two inclinations, fonder and latter. If the punishment for falling in errors in earlier times had been seize of the owner's land, and then falling in errors would have been their dearest wish, so that they could be relieved of writing their names in the landowners' record. This recompense would have been a reward for them, in actuality, and not a punishment, but now banks and mortgages companies it has become the most severe punishment for land owner. The time has come for our government to turn its consideration to the Laws of our courts, to make the appropriate for present conditions, choosing laws that are not difficult to understand, whose texts do not suggest multiple confused options. The articles of the new Law should not be the sort of general rules whose verdicts are meant to apply to various punishments for many diverse crimes just because of color and creed. The American eagle cannot prevent the People themselves from serving as a pretext for those who harbor immoral designs to play with people's rights as they wish. We urge this while recognizing the fact that those who exercise control over the law do not have the status of legislators able to derive the rulings which apply to the actual situations at hand from general rules or from texts which support interpretations contrary to their evident meaning.
Moreover, those of us who have legitimate claims are not 'beyond entertaining invalid suspicions and conjectures. We might suspect someone who is innocent of error or treachery, while the actual articles of the law do not provide a clear ruling and their texts are not transparent. This leads to repeated appeals for judicial inquiry of Justice System. The matter takes a long time, the welfare of the people is obstructed, expenses increase, resentments grow strong, and the gates of corruption are flung wide open with in Christians of America, given an abundance of legal cases and disputes, as is the case in our land at present. It is therefore necessary that the articles of the law be written explicitly, indicate rulings in a straight forward manner, apply to all possible cases, be set forth in logical categories, and use simple linguistic constructions of freedom.
The laws that have been in common use in our land up to now in addition to being insufficient, too general, and written in an unclear style-are not precise and well organized, nor are they known by the people. Certain laws are known as "The Imperial Law," some laws are named "Regulations," some are called "Directives of the Justice department," some are called "Decisions of the Special Council," others "Proclamations of Legal Rulings," some 'The Royal Decree sued on such and such a date," and so on ad infinitum. How could this scattered mess reasonably serve as a law by which the people should abide? Even if they Senate and congress informed the public of the law, it would remain inconceivable to them, because it is foreign to their conditions and beyond their capacity to understand The Patriot Act which only violates Minorities of Islamic religions.
It is necessary to reform this obvious flaw in our legal system, which has deprived people of their rights and jeopardized security. It behooves us to do this quickly and avoid wasting time in pointless discussions. The laws must fulfill all of the necessary restrictions and conditions, and should refer us back to the "Proclamations" or to the "Regulations." This should facilitate the determination of legal rulings and make the law form with the exigencies of the present situation of The Patriot Act. The laws should suit the conditions of the time and their level of comprehension, enabling them to understand the laws and abide by their requirements, each one according to his own situation. Otherwise, they will be nothing but ink on paper with distraction of America and common sense.
Scholars and political leaders of both ancient and modem times have long recognized that legislators and institutors of laws must always take into account customs and traditional habits in order to establish laws in a just and beneficial manner. Indeed, the conditions of nations are themselves the true legislator, the wise, regulating guide. The governing power is actually dependent on the capacities of its subjects; the Citizen does not take a single step unless induced to do so . True, we do not deny that the preparation of means and measures depends on the governing power and its knowledge of languages. The government imposes these things on its subjects to control freedom, wise would translate The Book of Rabi to understand but these impositions must be in accordance with the capacity of those ruled. Changes in the form of government and the replacement of its laws depend on the citizenry's legitimate claims as mine against The Patriot Act and these are tantamount to the condition of the dualism.
The shift of the government of people, for example, from an absolute monarchy to a restricted monarchy of FBI with little democracy for the people of color, then to a free republic, did not occur by the will of those in authority alone. Rather, the strongest contributing factors were the conditions of the people, the increase in their level of thought, and their new awareness of the need to ascend to a state higher than their present one. By learning what their true obligations were, they were able to overcome all the outside forces that had stood between them and the attainment of their desires. Moreover, they only arrived at this noble goal after breaking through the obstacles that stood before them otherwise they could not have reached their goal or attained their desire of freedom that represent Human Fealty of 21st century. American Dualism needs to diversified from the two party system to Democracy which is not a business of just few but whole society by observing new minor political ideologies from Municipalities to State Level. The system that has been in common sued to discourage minorities and diversities to participate in local, state and federal level must change to improve democracy for human fealty.
Since the identification of the proper means and measures presents a difficult puzzle for human intelligence and discernment, it is extremely difficult to learn and acquire them in their essential forms. Some people including me always experience questions from ICE officers at the John F Kennedy or in the Middle Eastern immigration transit when returning from overseas visit why, where ,when and who to make you feel that you are seventh class Citizen of America. This thought often occurs to me that a certain color of people think themselves that they are a higher level of human beings in 21st century. In 2008 the higher level of human beings had imagined by putting Mr. Brake Hussain Obama in the White House to improve relation with minorities, so they end up regressing to a less desirable state just because a person doesn't fulfill gape of laws with his pigment a law must passed throw the house and the senate like civil right act of 1965 which is due to be updated. While they set out to make legislation and participation in the establishment of laws which free and open to all but Mehdi, they are not safe from the machinations of special interests, nor do they possess the means necessary to prepare them for such an under taking. The disease of discord spreads rapidly through their collective body unless some chapters of the civil rights laws are rewriting and invalidate The Patriot Act.
Written by Ajmal Mehdi
The People Party of Connecticut
IN GOD WE TRUST WE HAVE FAITH IN HUMANITY